A Multiliteracy Learning Model as a Means to Address Language Dysphemism in Elementary School Children

Authors

  • Sugeng Riyanto Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Language, Multiliteracy, Dysphemism, Literacy

Abstract

Introduction to The Problem: Polite language creates positive value from speaking partners, while impolite language gives negative impressions. Purpose: This research aims to describe an appropriate multiliteracy learning model to address language dysphemia in elementary school children. Design/methods/approach: This study uses a qualitative approach based on Cresswell (2015:291). Data sources include interviews with classroom teachers implementing existential humanistic approaches, elementary students, and principals from public and private schools in Yogyakarta. Documentation includes audio-visual materials (photos, videotapes, recordings) and observations with field notes and reflections. Data validity follows Creswell and Miller's (2000) five criteria: data triangulation, member checking, prolonged observation with repeated site visits, and peer review. Findings: This multiliteracy learning model can develop speaking skills in elementary-age children accountably, as multiliteracy competency includes oral idea production ability. School programs supporting multiliteracy implementation must be systematic, flexible, realistic, and sustainable. Infrastructure requirements include libraries, reading corners, literacy centers, and teaching materials. Research implications/limitations: Multiliteracy concept reflects awareness of diverse human communication methods and literacy activities in analyzing received materials and media. This implies extensive critical analysis for text interpretation. School implementation can include DEAR programs promoting active participation through greetings, songs, and topic discussions to develop speaking, listening, interaction, and sharing abilities. Originality/value: This multiliteracy research presents novelty as an appropriate learning model for addressing impolite speech in students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Yunus. 2015. Pembelajaran Multiliterasi.Bandung : PT Refika Aditama.

Chaer, Abdul. 2014. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Creswell, J.W. (2015). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Felemban, F.H. (2012). Building up learners' communicative competence: the politeness principle. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 46, 70-76.

Faradina, Nindya. 2017. Pengaruh Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Terhadap Minat Baca Peserta didik di SD Islam Terpadu Muhammadiyah An-Najah Jatinom Klaten. Jurnal Hanata Widya Vol. 6, No. 8.

Gruber, C.W. (2012). Humanistik cognitive behavioral theory, a value-added approach to teaching theories of personality Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 252-259.

Hobjila, A. (2012).Positive Politeness and Negative Politeness in Didactic Communication – Landmarks in Teaching Methodology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 63, 213-222.

Illeris, K. (2011). Contemporary Theories of Learning. Bandung:Nusamedia

Kharizm,Muhammad. September 2015. Kesulitan Peserta didik Sekolah Dasar dalam MeningkatkanKemampuan Literasi. JUPENDAS, ISSN 2355-3650, Vol. 2, No. 2.

Lee, Y.C. (2011). Comparison of Politeness and Acceptability Perceptions of Request Strategies between Chinese Learners of English and Native English Speakers. Asian Social Science, 7(8),21-33

Manullang,Belferik.3013. Grand desain pendidikan karakter generasi emas 2045. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, Tahun III, Nomor 1, Februari 2013

Meilasari,Priska.2016. Analisis terjemahan ungkapan eufemisme dan disfemisme pada teks berita online bbc. Prasasti: journal of linguistics.vol.1 number 2 november 2016.

Miles, M.B & Huberman A.M. (1984), Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terj. Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta : Penerbit Universitas Indonesia

Musfiroh,Tadkiroatun&Listyorini,Beniati.2016.Konstruk kompetensi literasi untuk peserta didik sekolah dasar.LITERA, Volume 15, Nomor 1, April 2016.

Sari, Esti Swatika.2013.Model multiliterasi dalam perkuliahan pendidikan bahasa dan sastra Indonesia.LITERA, Volume 12, Nomor 2, Oktober 2013.

Saddono, Kundharu dan St.Y.Slamet.2014. Pembelajaran Keterampilan Berbahasa Indonesia.Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.

Sugihastuti, 2014.Bahasa Laporan Penelitian. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar Offest.

Sudibyo, Lies. 2011 Peranan dan Dampak Teknologi Informasi dalam Dunia Pendidikan di Indinesia.No. 2.

Suryaman, Maman.2015. Analisis hasil belajar peserta didik dalam literasi membaca melalui studi internasional (pirls) 2011.LITERA, Volume 14, Nomor 1, April 2015.

Tung, K.Y. (2015). Pembelajaran dan Perkembangan Belajar.Jakarta:Indeks.

Verhaar,J.W.M. (2012). Asas-Asas Linguistik Umum.Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Yule,G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zulela, 2012.Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia.Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Riyanto, S. (2024). A Multiliteracy Learning Model as a Means to Address Language Dysphemism in Elementary School Children. Linguanusa : Social Humanities, Education and Linguistic, 2(3), 71–78. Retrieved from http://linguanusa.com/index.php/1/article/view/82